Dyslexia as a Neurodevelopmental Disorder and What Makes It Different from a Chess Disorder (2024)

1. Landerl K., Ramus F., Moll K., Lyytinen H., Leppänen P.H.T., Lohvansuu K., O’Donovan M., Williams J., Bartling J., Bruder J., et al. Predictors of developmental dyslexia in European orthographies with varying complexity. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry. 2013;54:686–694. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12029. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

2. Peterson R.L., Pennington B.F. Developmental Dyslexia. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2015;11:283–307. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032814-112842. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

3. Elliott J.G. Dyslexia: Diagnoses, debates and diatribes. Educ. Can. 2006;46:14–17. [Google Scholar]

5. Lopes J. Biologising reading problems: The specific case of dyslexia. Contemp. Soc. Sci. 2012;7:215–229. doi:10.1080/21582041.2012.692098. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

6. Elliott J.G., Grigorenko E.L. The Dyslexia Debate. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2014. [Google Scholar]

7. Rice M., Brooks G. Developmental Dyslexia in Adults: A Research Review. NRDC; London, UK: 2004. [Google Scholar]

8. Goswami U. Typical reading development and developmental dyslexia across languages. In: Coch D., Dawson G., Fischer L.W., editors. Human Behavior, Learning, and the Developing Brain: Atypical Development. Guilford Press; New York, NY, USA: 2007. pp. 145–167. [Google Scholar]

9. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®) American Psychiatric Publishing; Washington, DC, USA: 2013. [Google Scholar]

10. Wakefield J.C. Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2017. Mental Disorders as Genuine Medical Conditions; pp. 65–82. [Google Scholar]

11. American Psychiatric Association . Neurodevelopmental Disorders: DSM-5® Selections. American Psychiatric Publishing; Washington, DC, USA: 2015. [Google Scholar]

12. Norbury C.F., Sparks A. Difference or disorder? Cultural issues in understanding neurodevelopmental disorders. Dev. Psychol. 2013;49:45–58. doi:10.1037/a0027446. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

13. Miller G.A., Rockstroh B.S., Hamilton H.K., Yee C.M. Psychophysiology as a core strategy in RDoC. Psychophysiology. 2016;53:410–414. doi:10.1111/psyp.12581. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

14. Cuthbert B.N., Insel T.R. Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: The seven pillars of RDoC. BMC Med. 2013;11:126. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-126. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

15. Reschly A.L. Reading and School Completion: Critical Connections and Matthew Effects. Read. Writ. Q. 2010;26:67–90. doi:10.1080/10573560903397023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

16. De Beer J., Engels J., Heerkens Y., Van Der Klink J. Factors Influencing Work Participation of Adults with Developmental Dyslexia: A Systematic Review. BMC Public Health. 2014 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-77. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

17. European Comission . EU High Level Group of Experts on Literacy. European Comission; Luxembourg: 2012. [Google Scholar]

18. UNESCO . Education for All: Literacy for Life. UNESCO; London, UK: 2005. [Google Scholar]

19. Sanchez Moretti G., Frandell T. Literacy from a right to education perspective. Report of the Director General of UNESCO to the United Nations General Assembly 68th Session. UNESCO; London, UK: 2013. [Google Scholar]

20. UNHCHR . UN Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989. UNHCHR; New York, NY, USA: 1989. [Google Scholar]

21. Ferrer E., Shaywitz B.A., Holahan J.M., Marchione K.E., Michaels R., Shaywitz S.E. Achievement Gap in Reading Is Present as Early as First Grade and Persists through Adolescence. J. Pediatr. 2015;167 doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.07.045. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

22. Shaywitz S., Morris R., Shaywitz B. The education of dyslexic children from childhood to young adulthood. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2008;59:451–475. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093633. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

23. Denton C.A., Tolar T.D., Fletcher J.M., Barth A.E., Vaughn S., Francis D.J. Effects of Tier 3 Intervention for Students with Persistent Reading Difficulties and Characteristics of Inadequate Responders. J. Educ. Psychol. 2013;105:633–648. doi:10.1037/a0032581. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

24. Scheltinga F., van der Leij A., Struiksma C. Predictors of response to intervention of word reading fluency in Dutch. J. Learn. Disabil. 2010;43:212–228. doi:10.1177/0022219409345015. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

25. Wanzek J., Vaughn S., Scammacca N.K., Metz K., Murray C.S., Roberts G., Danielson L. Extensive Reading Interventions for Students with Reading Difficulties after Grade 3. Rev. Educ. Res. 2013;83:163–195. doi:10.3102/0034654313477212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

26. Hendren R.L., Haft S.L., Black J.M., White N.C., Hoeft F. Recognizing Psychiatric Comorbidity with Reading Disorders. Front. Psychiatry. 2018;9:101. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00101. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

27. Daniel S.S., Walsh A.K., Goldston D.B., Arnold E.M., Reboussin B.A., Wood F.B. Suicidality, School Dropout, and Reading Problems among Adolescents. J. Learn. Disabil. 2006;39:507–514. doi:10.1177/00222194060390060301. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

28. Howren M.B. Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2013. Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) pp. 1605–1606. [Google Scholar]

29. Hakkaart-van Roijen L., Goettsch W.G., Ekkebus M., Gerretsen P., Stolk E.A. The Cost-Effectiveness of an Intensive Treatment Protocol for Severe Dyslexia in Children. Dyslexia. 2011;17:256–267. doi:10.1002/dys.436. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

30. First M.B., Wakefield J.C. Diagnostic Criteria as Dysfunction Indicators: Bridging the Chasm between the Definition of Mental Disorder and Diagnostic Criteria for Specific Disorders. Can. J. Psychiatry. 2013;58:663–669. doi:10.1177/070674371305801203. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

31. Stein D.J., Nesse R.M. Normal and Abnormal Anxiety in the Age of DSM-5 and ICD-11. Emot. Rev. 2015;7:223–229. doi:10.1177/1754073915575407. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

32. Nesse R.M., Stein D.J. Towards a genuinely medical model for psychiatric nosology. BMC Med. 2012;10:5. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

33. Kapur S., Phillips A.G., Insel T.R. Why has it taken so long for biological psychiatry to develop clinical tests and what to do about it? Mol. Psychiatry. 2012;17 doi:10.1038/mp.2012.105. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

34. Dejerine J. Sur un cas de cécité verbale avec agraphie, suivi d’autopsie. Mem. Soc. Biol. 1891;43:197–201. (in French) [Google Scholar]

35. Dehaene S., Cohen L., Morais J., Kolinsky R. Illiterate to literate: Behavioural and cerebral changes induced by reading acquisition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2015;16:234–244. doi:10.1038/nrn3924. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

36. Dehaene S., Cohen L. Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron. 2007;56:384–398. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.004. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

37. Schlaggar B.L., McCandliss B.D. Development of neural systems for reading. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2007;30:475–503. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135645. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

38. Wandell B.A., Le R.K. Diagnosing the Neural Circuitry of Reading. Neuron. 2017;96:298–311. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.08.007. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

39. Cohen L., Dehaene S., Naccache L., Lehéricy S., Dehaene-Lambertz G., Hénaff M.-A., Michel F. The visual word form area: Spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain. 2000;123:291–307. doi:10.1093/brain/123.2.291. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

40. Damasio A.R., Damasio H. The anatomic basis of pure alexia. Neurology. 1983;33:1573–1583. doi:10.1212/WNL.33.12.1573. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

41. Epelbaum S., Pinel P., Gaillard R., Delmaire C., Perrin M., Dupont S., Dehaene S., Cohen L. Pure alexia as a disconnection syndrome: New diffusion imaging evidence for an old concept. Cortex. 2008;44:962–974. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.05.003. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

42. Van Atteveldt N., Ansari D. How symbols transform brain function: A review in memory of Leo Blomert. Trends Neurosci. Educ. 2014;3:44–49. doi:10.1016/j.tine.2014.04.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

43. Vandermosten M., Boets B., Wouters J., Ghesquière P. A qualitative and quantitative review of diffusion tensor imaging studies in reading and dyslexia. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2012;36:1532–1552. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.04.002. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

44. Altarelli I., Leroy F., Monzalvo K., Fluss J., Billard C., Dehaene-Lambertz G., Galaburda A.M., Ramus F. Planum temporale asymmetry in developmental dyslexia: Revisiting an old question. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2014;35:5717–5735. doi:10.1002/hbm.22579. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

45. Richlan F., Kronbichler M., Wimmer H. Meta-analyzing brain dysfunctions in dyslexic children and adults. Neuroimage. 2011;56:1735–1742. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.040. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

46. Shaywitz S., Shaywitz B. Paying attention to reading: The neurobiology of reading and dyslexia. Dev. Psychopathol. 2008;20:1329–1349. doi:10.1017/S0954579408000631. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

47. Van der Mark S., Bucher K., Maurer U., Schulz E., Brem S., Buckelmüller J., Kronbichler M., Loenneker T., Klaver P., Martin E., et al. Children with dyslexia lack multiple specializations along the visual word-form (VWF) system. Neuroimage. 2009;47:1940–1949. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.021. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

48. Hämäläinen J.A., Salminen H.K., Leppänen P.H.T. Basic auditory processing deficits in dyslexia: Systematic review of the behavioral and event-related potential/field evidence. J. Learn. Disabil. 2012;46:413–427. doi:10.1177/0022219411436213. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

49. Raschle N.M., Stering P.L., Meissner S.N., Gaab N. Altered Neuronal Response During Rapid Auditory Processing and Its Relation to Phonological Processing in Prereading Children at Familial Risk for Dyslexia. Cereb. Cortex. 2013:2489–2501. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht104. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

50. Blau V., Reithler J., van Atteveldt N., Seitz J., Gerretsen P., Goebel R., Blomert L. Deviant processing of letters and speech sounds as proximate cause of reading failure: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of dyslexic children. Brain. 2010;133:868–879. doi:10.1093/brain/awp308. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

51. Blomert L. The neural signature of orthographic-phonological binding in successful and failing reading development. Neuroimage. 2011;57:695–703. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.003. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

52. Blau V., van Atteveldt N., Ekkebus M., Goebel R., Blomert L. Reduced neural integration of letters and speech sounds links phonological and reading deficits in adult dyslexia. Curr. Biol. 2009;19:503–508. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.065. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

53. Fraga González G., Žarić G., Tijms J., Bonte M., van der Molen M.W. Contributions of Letter-Speech Sound Learning and Visual Print Tuning to Reading Improvement: Evidence from Brain Potential and Dyslexia Training Studies. Brain Sci. 2017;7:10. doi:10.3390/brainsci7010010. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

54. Maurer U., McCandliss B.D. In: The Development of the Visual Expertise for Words: The Contribution of Electrophysiology. Grigorenko E.L., Naples A.J., editors. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; Mahwah, NJ, USA: 2007. [Google Scholar]

55. Goswami U. A temporal sampling framework for developmental dyslexia. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011;15:3–10. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.10.001. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

56. Fraga González G., Van der Molen M.J.W., Žarić G., Bonte M., Tijms J., Blomert L., Stam C.J., Van der Molen M.W. Corrigendum to “Graph analysis of EEG resting state functional networks in dyslexic readers” [Clin. Neurophysiol. 127(9) (2016) 3165–3175] Clin. Neurophysiol. 2018;129:339–340. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2017.09.106. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

57. Dimitriadis S.I., Laskaris N.A., Simos P.G., Fletcher J.M., Papanicolaou A.C. Greater Repertoire and Temporal Variability of Cross-Frequency Coupling (CFC) Modes in Resting-State Neuromagnetic Recordings among Children with Reading Difficulties. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2016;10:163. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00163. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

58. Hanco*ck R., Pugh K.R., Hoeft F. Neural Noise Hypothesis of Developmental Dyslexia. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2017;21:434–448. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.03.008. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

59. Žarić G., Correia J.M., Fraga González G., Tijms J., van der Molen M.W., Blomert L., Bonte M. Altered patterns of directed connectivity within the reading network of dyslexic children and their relation to reading dysfluency. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2017;23 doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.003. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

60. Pugh K.R., Mencl W., Shaywitz B., Shaywitz S., Fulbright R.K., Constable R.T., Skudlarski P., Marchione K.E., Jenner A., Fletcher J.M., et al. The angular gyrus in developmental dyslexia: Task-specific differences in functional connectivity within posterior cortex. Psychol. Sci. 2000;11:51–56. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00214. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

61. Van der Mark S., Klaver P., Bucher K., Maurer U., Schulz E., Brem S., Martin E., Brandeis D. The left occipitotemporal system in reading: Disruption of focal fMRI connectivity to left inferior frontal and inferior parietal language areas in children with dyslexia. Neuroimage. 2011;54:2426–2436. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.002. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

62. Ramus F., Altarelli I., Jednoróg K., Zhao J., Scotto di Covella L. Neuroanatomy of developmental dyslexia: Pitfalls and promise. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2018;84:434–452. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.08.001. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

63. Ramus F. Should there really be a ‘Dyslexia debate’? Brain. 2014;137:3371–3374. doi:10.1093/brain/awu295. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

64. Barquero L., Davis N., Cutting L.E. Neuroimaging of reading intervention: A systematic review and activation likelihood estimate meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e83668. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083668. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

65. Maisog J.M., Einbinder E.R., Flowers D.L., Turkeltaub P.E., Eden G.F. A Meta-analysis of Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Dyslexia. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008;1145:237–259. doi:10.1196/annals.1416.024. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

66. Richlan F. Functional neuroanatomy of developmental dyslexia: The role of orthographic depth. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014;8:347. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00347. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

67. Baron-Cohen S. Editorial Perspective: Neurodiversity—A revolutionary concept for autism and psychiatry. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry. 2017;58:744–747. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12703. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

68. Huettig F., Lachmann T., Reis A., Petersson K.M. Distinguishing cause from effect—Many deficits associated with developmental dyslexia may be a consequence of reduced and suboptimal reading experience. Lang. Cogn. Neurosci. 2018;33:333–350. doi:10.1080/23273798.2017.1348528. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

69. Goswami U. Sensory theories of developmental dyslexia: Three challenges for research. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2015;16:43–54. doi:10.1038/nrn3836. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

70. Molfese D.L. Predicting dyslexia at 8 years of age using neonatal brain responses. Brain Lang. 2000;72:238–245. doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2287. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

71. Van Herten M., Pasman J., van Leeuwen T.H., Been P.H., van der Leij A., Zwarts F., Maassen B. Differences in AERP responses and atypical hemispheric specialization in 17-month-old children at risk of dyslexia. Brain Res. 2008;1201:100–105. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.01.060. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

72. Maurer U., Bucher K., Brem S., Benz R., Kranz F., Schulz E., van der Mark S., Steinhausen H.-C., Brandeis D. Neurophysiology in preschool improves behavioral prediction of reading ability throughout primary school. Biol. Psychiatry. 2009;66:341–348. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.02.031. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

73. Im K., Raschle N.M., Smith S.A., Ellen Grant P., Gaab N. Atypical Sulcal Pattern in Children with Developmental Dyslexia and At-Risk Kindergarteners. Cereb. Cortex. 2016;26:1138–1148. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu305. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

74. Bach S., Richardson U., Brandeis D., Martin E., Brem S. Print-specific multimodal brain activation in kindergarten improves prediction of reading skills in second grade. Neuroimage. 2013;82:605–615. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.062. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

75. Brem S., Bach S., Kujala J.V., Maurer U., Lyytinen H., Richardson U., Brandeis D. An electrophysiological study of print processing in kindergarten: The contribution of the visual N1 as a predictor of reading outcome. Dev. Neuropsychol. 2013;38:567–594. doi:10.1080/87565641.2013.828729. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

76. Kraft I., Schreiber J., Cafiero R., Metere R., Schaadt G., Brauer J., Neef N.E., Müller B., Kirsten H., Wilcke A., et al. Predicting early signs of dyslexia at a preliterate age by combining behavioral assessment with structural MRI. Neuroimage. 2016;143:378–386. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.004. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

77. Saygin Z.M., Osher D.E., Norton E.S., Youssoufian D.A., Beach S.D., Feather J., Gaab N., Gabrieli J.D.E., Kanwisher N. Connectivity precedes function in the development of the visual word form area. Nat. Neurosci. 2016;19:1250–1255. doi:10.1038/nn.4354. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

78. Karipidis I.I., Pleisch G., Brandeis D., Roth A., Röthlisberger M., Schneebeli M., Walitza S., Brem S. Simulating reading acquisition: The link between reading outcome and multimodal brain signatures of letter—Speech sound learning in prereaders. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:7121. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-24909-8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

79. Lohvansuu K., Hämäläinen J.A., Ervast L., Lyytinen H., Leppänen P.H.T. Longitudinal interactions between brain and cognitive measures on reading development from 6 months to 14 years. Neuropsychologia. 2018;108:6–12. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.11.018. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

80. Lyytinen H., Guttorm T.K., Huttunen T., Hämäläinen J., Leppänen P.H.T., Vesterinen M. Psychophysiology of developmental dyslexia: A review of findings including studies of children at risk for dyslexia. J. Neurolinguist. 2005;18:167–195. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2004.11.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

81. Karipidis I.I., Pleisch G., Röthlisberger M., Hofstetter C., Dornbierer D., Stämpfli P., Brem S. Neural initialization of audiovisual integration in prereaders at varying risk for developmental dyslexia. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2017;38:1038–1055. doi:10.1002/hbm.23437. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

82. Meng H., Smith S.D., Hager K., Held M., Liu J., Olson R.K., Pennington B.F., DeFries J.C., Gelernter J., O’Reilly-Pol T., et al. DCDC2 is associated with reading disability and modulates neuronal development in the brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:17053–17058. doi:10.1073/pnas.0508591102. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

83. Wilcke A., Weissfuss J., Kirsten H., Wolfram G., Boltze J., Ahnert P. The role of gene DCDC2 in German dyslexics. Ann. Dyslexia. 2009;59 doi:10.1007/s11881-008-0020-7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

84. Marino C., Scifo P., Della Rosa P.A., Mascheretti S., Facoetti A., Lorusso M.L., Giorda R., Consonni M., Falini A., Molteni M., et al. The DCDC2/intron 2 deletion and white matter disorganization: Focus on developmental dyslexia. Cortex. 2014;57:227–243. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.04.016. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

85. Darki F., Peyrard-Janvid M., Matsson H., Kere J., Klingberg T. Three Dyslexia Susceptibility Genes, DYX1C1, DCDC2, and KIAA0319, Affect Temporo-Parietal White Matter Structure. Biol. Psychiatry. 2012;72:671–676. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.05.008. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

86. Van Bergen E., Snowling M.J., de Zeeuw E.L., van Beijsterveldt C.E.M., Dolan C.V., Boomsma D.I. Why do children read more? The influence of reading ability on voluntary reading practices. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry. 2018 doi:10.1111/jcpp.12910. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

87. Horbach J., Weber K., Opolony F., Scharke W., Radach R., Heim S., Günther T. Performance in sound-symbol learning predicts reading performance three years later. Front. Psychol. 2018;9:1716. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01716. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

88. Aravena S., Tijms J., Snellings P., van der Molen M.W. Predicting Individual Differences in Reading and Spelling Skill with Artificial Script-Based Letter-Speech Sound Training. J. Learn. Disabil. 2017 doi:10.1177/0022219417715407. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

89. Aravena S., Tijms J., Snellings P., van der Molen M.W. Predicting responsiveness to intervention in dyslexia using dynamic assessment. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2016;49:209–215. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.024. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

90. Blomert L. Protocol Dyslexie Diagnostiek en Behandeling. College voor Zorgverzekeringen; Diemen, The Netherlands: 2006. [Google Scholar]

91. Hoeft F., Ueno T., Reiss A.L., Meyler A., Whitfield-Gabrieli S., Glover G.H., Keller T.A., Kobayashi N., Mazaika P., Jo B., et al. Prediction of children’s reading skills using behavioral, functional, and structural neuroimaging measures. Behav. Neurosci. 2007;121:602–613. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.121.3.602. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

92. Black J., Myers C., Hoeft F. The Utility of Neuroimaging Studies for Informing Educational Practice and Policy in Reading Disorders. New Dir. Child Adolesc. Dev. 2015:49–56. doi:10.1002/cad.20086. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

93. Fuchs D., Fuchs L.S. Introduction to Response to Intervention: What, Why, and How Valid Is It? Read. Res. Q. 2006;41:93–99. doi:10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

94. Brown Waesche J.S., Schatschneider C., Maner J.K., Ahmed Y., Wagner R.K. Examining Agreement and Longitudinal Stability Among Traditional and RTI-Based Definitions of Reading Disability Using the Affected-Status Agreement Statistic. J. Learn. Disabil. 2011;44:296–307. doi:10.1177/0022219410392048. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

95. Snowling M.J., Hulme C. Annual Research Review: The nature and classification of reading disorders—A commentary on proposals for DSM-5. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry. 2012;53:593–607. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02495.x. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

96. Lemons C.J., Key A.P.F., Fuchs D., Yoder P.J., Fuchs L.S., Compton D.L., Williams S.M., Bouton B. Predicting Reading Growth with Event-Related Potentials: Thinking Differently about Indexing “Responsiveness” Learn. Individ. Differ. 2010;20:158–166. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.11.006. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

97. Ozernov-Palchik O., Gaab N. Tackling the ‘dyslexia paradox’: Reading brain and behavior for early markers of developmental dyslexia. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 2016;7:156–176. doi:10.1002/wcs.1383. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

98. Wanzek J., Wexler J., Vaughn S., Ciullo S. Reading interventions for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades: A synthesis of 20 years of research. Read. Writ. 2010;23:889–912. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9179-5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

99. Gustafson S., Svensson I., Fälth L. Response to Intervention and Dynamic Assessment: Implementing Systematic, Dynamic and Individualised Interventions in Primary School. Int. J. Disabil. Dev. Educ. 2014;61:27–43. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2014.878538. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

100. Molfese P.J., Fletcher J.M., Denton C.A. Adequate versus inadequate response to reading intervention: An event-related potentials assessment. Dev. Neuropsychol. 2013;38:534–549. doi:10.1080/87565641.2013.825260. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

101. Farris E.A., Odegard T.N., Miller H.L., Ring J., Allen G., Black J. Functional connectivity between the left and right inferior frontal lobes in a small sample of children with and without reading difficulties. Neurocase. 2011;17:425–439. doi:10.1080/13554794.2010.532141. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

102. Borsboom D., Cramer A.O.J. Network Analysis: An Integrative Approach to the Structure of Psychopathology. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2013;9:91–121. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

104. Casey B.J., Oliveri M.E., Insel T. A neurodevelopmental perspective on the research domain criteria (RDoC) framework. Biol. Psychiatry. 2014;76:350–353. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.01.006. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]