Traditional Retirement Planning Is Dead (2024)

By Todd Tresidder

Advertising Disclosure

Financial Mentor has commercial relationships with certain companies we reference on this website. Opinions are ours alone, and we take a good faith approach to maintaining objectivity. If we wouldn’t use a product ourselves, we won’t recommend it. We strive to keep information accurate and up-to-date, however, all products are presented without warranty.

Financial Mentor has partnered with CardRatings for our coverage of credit card products. Financial Mentor and CardRatings may receive a commission from card issuers. Opinions, reviews, analyses & recommendations are the author’s alone, and have not been reviewed, endorsed or approved by any of these entities.

Reveals A Newer, Better Model To Achieve Financial Security

Key Ideas

  1. 3 little-known reasons traditional retirement planning failed.
  2. 8 surprising facts to help secure your financial future.
  3. What caused the retirement planning myth?

Traditional retirement planning has failed.

  • According to the New York Times, 75% of Americans have less than $30,000 in their retirement accounts, and 49% of middle-class workers will retire poor or near poor.
  • According to Hewitt Associates, 4 out of 5 workers will fail to meet all their financial needs in retirement.
  • Employee Benefit Research Institute reports that 81% of workers nearing retirement age (45 or older) have less than $250,000 in savings and an astounding 48% have accumulated less than $25,000 as they approach retirement.
  • Only 64% of American workers are confident they will have enough money to retire according the annual Retirement Confidence Survey.

The evidence is overwhelming that something is wrong with traditional retirement planning. It’s an old world model in need of a major facelift.

The problem is baked into how the retirement system is designed—it’s not realistic.

The skills and knowledge required to successfully execute a traditional retirement plan are beyond most worker’s abilities:

  • You must voluntarily save a significant portion of your income with discipline throughout your career (8%–30%, depending on the age you begin saving).
  • You mustdevelop sufficient investment expertise to implement smart asset allocation and investment decisions.
  • You must know in advance when you and your spouse will die to know how much savings are required.
  • You must know in advance when you will end work—either voluntarily, due to sickness, or possibly because of lay-offs out of your control.
  • You must know what the future inflation rate will be over your remaining life (even though trained economists can’t accurately predict this number even one year in advance).
  • You must know what your investment portfolio will return over your remaining life (even though nobody can predict this number for one year, not to mention 30 years).
  • You must be disciplined enough to never raid your retirement nest egg when adversity strikes, like getting laid off, health problems, kid’s college, or getting divorced.
  • And then, to top it all off, you’re supposed to manage your retirement savings so that you spend your last dollar as you exhale your last breath.

Traditional retirement planning is dead. It requires an absurd list of skills and knowledge that few have.

Click To Tweet

Yeah, right! No wonder most workers are failing at retirement planning.

It's an almost unbelievable list of skills and knowledge that few, if any, workers possess.

Related: Why you need a wealth plan, not a financial plan.

It requires you to have the savings discipline of a celibate monk living in a brothel, investment skills that exceed most pension and mutual fund professionals, and the actuarial skills of an insurance expert.

That sounds like pretty demanding standards for someone who aspires to quit work.

Traditional retirement planning is a broken model.

The system is failing people because the absurd list of skills required to succeed is unrealistic.

Get This Article Sent to Your Inbox as a PDF…

Walking the Talk Makes All The Difference

The reason the broken model persists is because most “retirement experts” that teach this stuff have no real experience being “retired”, living off their portfolio, and surviving without earned income.

Reality is very different from theory: the retirement map most experts teach is not the territory.

After “retiring” more than two decades ago and raising a family of four with almost no earned income, I can tell you that retirement living isn’t nearly as neat and clean as the sterile books would (mis)lead you to believe.

See My Related Book…

I’ve survived multiple bubbles in stocks andreal estate (and probably bonds someday soon), and the conventional rules of thumb are hazardous to your wealth.

Below are some particularly important ideas you’re not likely to hear about from a traditional financial planner at your next retirement planning meeting.

Increasing Longevity Has Changed The Rules

Life expectancy is increasing every year, and the higher income classes can expect the greatest longevity in old age. If you have the wealth to fund a secure retirement, then you should also expect to outlive the averages (unless your genetics indicate otherwise).

90% confidence intervals for a healthy couple at age 65 are already growing past the age 100 barrier. In other words, forget the statistical averages. You must financially prepare to live far longer than anyone would tell you, because the alternative is to risk outliving your money, and that's not acceptable.

Spending Principal Is Dangerous

When your assets have to survive 30 years or more, it means you cannot safely spend investment principal like conventional retirement planning would indicate.

This means you must live on portfolio income exclusively during the early years, because there is no safe way to amortize principal over a 30+ year time horizon, given all the unknown variables (see The 4% Rule and Safe Withdrawal Rates for more detail).

That requires you to amass a much larger investment portfolio than traditional retirement planning would indicate, or consider alternative portfolios to produce inflation adjusting income and growth.

Inflation Is Your Number One Enemy

Inflation is the number one nemesis of retirees. That’s because a retiree is, by definition, a saver, and inflation is the cancer that consumes savings.

Inflation is all the more insidious because you have no control over it, can hardly detect it from year to year, cannot estimate it accurately, and small differences will compound over many years to potentially double the amount of money you need to safely retire. Inflation is one of the top risk factors to your financial security.

It's Tough To Grow Purchasing Power While Living Off Savings

It's exceedingly difficult to grow a portfolio fast enough using conventional, passiveasset allocation to increase your saving’s purchasing power net of inflation, lifestyle expenses, volatility effects, and the inevitable mistakes and surprises of life.

Few people grow their portfolios faster than inflation after subtracting just transaction costs, mistakes, and other issues. When you start subtracting lifestyle expenses from your savings, the hurdle is extraordinarily difficult to clear.

The Average Return Lie

The big reason it's so difficult to grow your assets net of inflation, spending, mistakes, and investment expenses is the “average return lie”.

The experts love to quote average historical returns, but the only return you can actually spend is thecompound return.

Related: 5 Financial Planning Mistakes That Cost You Big-Time (and what to do instead!) Explained in 5 Free Video Lessons

Average returns are a statistical fiction. The seldom-told truth is that compound returns are always less than average returns, and the culprit is volatility. The greater the volatility, the greater the difference between average return and compound return.

For example, if your investments are up 50% one year, and down 50% next year, then the average return is break-even, but your account actually lost 25% when compounded. The 25% loss is the only return that matters to a real retiree, and it's caused by the volatility effect.

Sequence Of Returns Risk

Now that you understand the volatility effect, let’s add insult to injury by introducing sequence of returns risk. You will quickly see why living off your retirement nest egg is more risky than commonly understood.

Imagine an adverse period of returns that runs a decade or more. This occurs regularly in actual market history with the most recent example beginning in 2000.

If you started your retirement in 2000 with a conventional passive indexed portfolio, and supported living expenses from assets according to the conventional 4% rule, you would have incurred a portfolio drawdown just from spending that exceeded 50% (not to mention investment mistakes, investment expenses, volatility effects on compound return, and more).

Given the dismal investment returns over the same time period, your monthly spending would be approaching or exceeding 10% of assets (depending on assumptions), which is unsustainable and certainly not safe.

Related: How to make more from your investing by risking less

This isn't some theoretical mumbo-jumbo. It happened to countless real-world retirees who relied on conventional wisdom and got burned. It results from an adverse sequence of investment returns like we've had since 2000.

Research shows this sequence of returns risk during the first 10-15 years of retirement accounts for 80% (or more) of the variance in safe withdrawal rates during retirement.

It's incredibly important to understand, yet few retirees do. If you need more guidance, our step-by-step wealth planning course can get you on the right track so youcan guarantee your retirement security.

Poverty Consciousness

The process of living off your assets with no earned income creates a poverty mentality for anyone successful and actuarially minded enough to build the wealth in the first place.

It causes a feeling of lack, even though you're surrounded by a plentiful portfolio. It is why you see multi-millionaire elderly people in their 80’s pinching pennies and refusing to enjoy their money, even though they couldn’t spend it all if they tried.

It's difficult to understand until you live it. Basically, your financial reality narrows when you become 100% dependent on your assets with zero earned income. The result is tragic: a poverty experience, even though you're surrounded by abundance.

Forget The Cliches About Retirement Happiness

Finally, a satisfying retirement isn’t anything like the clichés indicate. A fulfilling life is built on much more than endless rounds of golf and little umbrella drinks under a palm tree at sunset.

I’ve tried all extremes from workaholic to pro-leisure circuit, and everything in-between. In my experience, the most satisfying retirement includes a lifestyle business that produces some income without inhibiting the freedom to do what you want with your life.

It takes pressure off your assets and relieves the poverty mentality while providing a sense of purpose, community, mental stimulation, contribution, and social connection (that's why I provide money coaching services).

Vacations are more enjoyable when contrasted with meaningful work. The truth is, work provides underrated benefits during retirement, because most people need something more to wake up for than just personal self-indulgence.

Traditional Retirement Planning Is Dead (6)

Retirement Summary

If you want to learn more about how the financial aspects of retirement planning work, make sure to pick up my latest book:How Much Money Do I Need To Retire?

Retirement planning doesn’t work in practice like most experts preach. The differences aren’t small either. They are game changing.

From saving, to investing, to life planning, the retirement experience operates under a set of rules very different from what is commonly believed.

In the comments below, please add to this discussion by sharing your experience with traditional retirement planning.

  • How will your retirement differ from your parents and grandparents?
  • What has worked for you in traditional retirement planning, and what hasn't?
  • What are some of your favorite ideas in retirement planning?

I'd really like to know what you think about these ideas…

The One Decision That Can Make Or Break Your Financial Future

There are only four paths you can choose from.

Click below to find out which path is best for you, and why.

Yes! Tell Me About Expectancy Wealth Planning strategy

Want a PDF of this article? We'll email it to you!

Related...

12 Tips To Build Wealth For Early Retirement

27 Retirement Savings Catch-Up Strategies For Late Starters

5 Ways To Reduce How Much You Need To Save For Retirement By $300,000 (or More!)

8 Shortcuts For A Simple Retirement Plan In Record Time

FM 002: How To Retire At 50 with Darrow Kirkpatrick

FM 010: How To Engineer Your Wealth Using Retirement Calculators With Darrow Kirkpatrick

Pension News: You're on Your Own For Retirement

Preparing For Retirement - The 5 Essential Questions

Retirement Savings Statistics Are Ugly

The Smart Alternative To Retirement Planning

Simple Retirement Savings Calculator

Ultimate Retirement Calculator

Traditional Retirement Planning Is Dead (2024)

FAQs

Traditional Retirement Planning Is Dead? ›

Traditional retirement planning has failed. According to the New York Times, 75% of Americans have less than $30,000 in their retirement accounts, and 49% of middle-class workers will retire poor or near poor. According to Hewitt Associates, 4 out of 5 workers will fail to meet all their financial needs in retirement.

What is the $1000 a month rule for retirement? ›

The $1,000-a-month retirement rule says that you should save $240,000 for every $1,000 of monthly income you'll need in retirement. So, if you anticipate a $4,000 monthly budget when you retire, you should save $960,000 ($240,000 * 4).

Why are Millennials not saving for retirement? ›

By some measures, millennials lag on retirement preparedness and net worth relative to older generations such as Gen X and baby boomers. There are many reasons for this, such as a shift away from pensions toward 401(k) plans and high student debt burdens.

What happens to people with no retirement plan? ›

You may have to rely on Social Security

Many retirees with little to no savings rely solely on Social Security as their main source of income. You can claim Social Security benefits as early as age 62, but your benefit amount will depend on when you start filing for the benefit.

What is the 4% rule in retirement planning? ›

The 4% rule limits annual withdrawals from your retirement accounts to 4% of the total balance in your first year of retirement. That means if you retire with $1 million saved, you'd take out $40,000. According to the rule, this amount is safe enough that you won't risk running out of money during a 30-year retirement.

How long will $500,000 last year in retirement? ›

According to the 4% rule, if you retire with $500,000 in assets, you should be able to withdraw $20,000 per year for 30 years or more. Moreover, investing this money in an annuity could provide a guaranteed annual income of $24,688 for those retiring at 55.

Can I retire at 70 with $300 K? ›

If you've managed to save $300k successfully, there's a good chance you'll be able to retire comfortably, though you will have to make some compromises and consider your plans carefully if you want to make that your final figure.

Why will Gen Z not retire? ›

Retirement doesn't seem possible for a quarter of Gen Z

Credible is solely responsible for the services it provides. Generation Z faces an uncertain financial world, and they're well aware they likely won't have the same benefits as generations that preceded them.

Do 66% of millennials have nothing saved for retirement? ›

More specifically, the analysis finds that 66 percent of working Millennials have nothing saved for retirement, and the situation is far worse for working Millennial Latinos. Some 83 percent of Latinos in this generation have nothing saved for retirement.

How much does the average Gen Z have in savings? ›

Gen Z — the post-Millenial generation, born roughly between 1997-2012 — are mostly in their teens, but the oldest among them is already 22 and by 2025, they'll account for 27% of the workforce. The study shows that for workers ages 18 to 25, the median they have saved — across retirement accounts — is $33,000.

How to retire at 62 with no savings? ›

If you retire with no money, you'll have to consider ways to create income to pay your living expenses. That might include applying for Social Security retirement benefits, getting a reverse mortgage if you own a home, or starting a side hustle or part-time job to generate a steady paycheck.

How many people retire with no savings? ›

Nearly 2 in 5 Retirees Have No Retirement Savings.

How to survive retirement with no money? ›

Consider part-time work in retirement. If you are able, planning to have a nontraditional retirement may be something you want to consider as well. Income from part-time work coupled with your Social Security benefit could be all you need to live comfortably.

How long will $400,000 last in retirement? ›

Safe Withdrawal Rate

Using our portfolio of $400,000 and the 4% withdrawal rate, you could withdraw $16,000 annually from your retirement accounts and expect your money to last for at least 30 years. If, say, your Social Security checks are $2,000 monthly, you'd have a combined annual income in retirement of $40,000.

Which is the biggest expense for most retirees? ›

Housing. Housing—which includes mortgage, rent, property tax, insurance, maintenance and repair costs—is the largest expense for retirees.

How many people have $1,000,000 in retirement savings? ›

If you have more than $1 million saved in retirement accounts, you are in the top 3% of retirees. According to EBRI estimates based on the latest Federal Reserve Survey of Consumer Finances, 3.2% of retirees have over $1 million in their retirement accounts, while just 0.1% have $5 million or more.

How much does the average retired person live on per month? ›

Retirement Income Varies Widely By State
StateAverage Retirement Income
California$34,737
Colorado$32,379
Connecticut$32,052
Delaware$31,283
47 more rows
Oct 30, 2023

Can you live off $3000 a month in retirement? ›

That means that even if you're not one of those lucky few who have $1 million or more socked away, you can still retire well, so long as you keep your monthly budget under $3,000 a month.

What is a good monthly retirement income? ›

Average Monthly Retirement Income

According to data from the BLS, average 2022 incomes after taxes were as follows for older households: 65-74 years: $63,187 per year or $5,266 per month. 75 and older: $47,928 per year or $3,994 per month.

What is the average Social Security check? ›

Social Security offers a monthly benefit check to many kinds of recipients. As of December 2023, the average check is $1,767.03, according to the Social Security Administration – but that amount can differ drastically depending on the type of recipient. In fact, retirees typically make more than the overall average.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Ms. Lucile Johns

Last Updated:

Views: 6652

Rating: 4 / 5 (61 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Ms. Lucile Johns

Birthday: 1999-11-16

Address: Suite 237 56046 Walsh Coves, West Enid, VT 46557

Phone: +59115435987187

Job: Education Supervisor

Hobby: Genealogy, Stone skipping, Skydiving, Nordic skating, Couponing, Coloring, Gardening

Introduction: My name is Ms. Lucile Johns, I am a successful, friendly, friendly, homely, adventurous, handsome, delightful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.