With Tiger Woods making his return to competitive golf on Thursday at the Hero World Challenge, the “GOAT” (greatest of all time, for the layperson) debate has resurfaced.
This week, Golf Channel analyst Brandel Chamblee was interviewed on SiriusXM PGA Tour Radio by former PGA Tour player Rocco Mediate and gave his opinion on the matter.
“That period from ’99 to 2002, as miraculous as it was, he won 34% of the time. I think undervalued, and it is where you run into him, in 2006 to 2009. In that period of time, Rocco, he won 46% of the tournaments he played in.”
“He won 25 of 54 and the scoring average over four years, think about this. Four years on the PGA Tour his scoring average was 67.9. That’s adjusted, it’s important to adjust it because he’s mostly playing in the toughest tournaments with the best fields.”
Chamblee continued, arguing that Jack Nicklaus wasn’t quite as dominant at his peak despite having the overall better career.
“Jack’s level of dominance, his best years were ’65 and ’73. He was three-quarters of a shot better than the next-best player in scoring average.
“Jack could have won the Vardon Trophy nine times but never played enough rounds to officially get it. So, you’re talking about somebody who was twice as dominant as the game’s greatest player. So, whenever I get that question you know, ‘who was better, Tiger or Jack?’ I always say, ‘well, Jack had the better career, Tiger was more dominant – he played the better golf.”
"Jack had the better career…Tiger was more dominant."
As @TigerWoods returns at the Hero World Challenge, Brandel Chamblee joins Rocco Mediate to answer the question: Tiger or Jack?
Listen to the Rocco Hour Tuesdays at 6 ET on SiriusXM 92.@chambleebrandel | @RoccoMediate pic.twitter.com/U247TGw2vh
— SiriusXM PGA TOUR Radio (@SiriusXMPGATOUR) November 29, 2023
Although it would be a minor miracle after all of his medical issues, Woods still has a chance to add to his legacy with more starts over the next handful of years.
More from the 19th Hole
- “It has to be the right fit” – Notah Begay explains the factors Tiger may need to win 83rd title
- “I could watch this all day” – Golf fans can’t get enough of this Tiger Woods putting drill
- Collin Morikawa explains decision to split with coach of 18 years
New here?
Your Reaction?
- LIKE0
- LEGIT0
- WOW0
- LOL0
- IDHT0
- FLOP0
- OB0
- SHANK0
As a golf enthusiast with a deep understanding of the sport, let's delve into the fascinating debate surrounding the "GOAT" in golf, ignited by Tiger Woods' return to competitive play at the Hero World Challenge.
Brandel Chamblee, a respected Golf Channel analyst, recently shared his insights on the SiriusXM PGA Tour Radio, adding a layer of nuance to the perennial discussion. Chamblee highlighted a specific timeframe in Tiger's career, from 2006 to 2009, asserting that this period showcased Woods at the pinnacle of his dominance. During these years, Tiger won a remarkable 46% of the tournaments he participated in, amassing a total of 25 victories out of 54 events.
Chamblee underscored the significance of adjusting Tiger's scoring average during this period, emphasizing that it was an impressive 67.9. This adjustment is crucial, considering Tiger consistently competed in challenging tournaments featuring the best fields in the PGA Tour. Such statistics aim to provide a comprehensive view of Tiger's prowess and underscore the intensity of competition he faced during his peak years.
In the comparison with the legendary Jack Nicklaus, Chamblee contended that while Nicklaus had an overall better career, Tiger's peak was characterized by unmatched dominance. Nicklaus' most dominant years, according to Chamblee, were '65 and '73, where he maintained a scoring average three-quarters of a shot better than his closest competitor. Chamblee also noted that Jack Nicklaus could have potentially won the Vardon Trophy nine times but never played enough rounds to officially claim it. This comparison positions Nicklaus as having a more consistent career, but Tiger as the more dominant player in specific periods.
Chamblee's perspective adds layers to the "Jack vs. Tiger" debate, encapsulating the nuanced elements of career longevity versus peak dominance. As we witness Tiger Woods' return to the course, there's anticipation about whether he can further solidify his legacy despite enduring significant medical challenges. It's a testament to his enduring impact on the sport and the perpetual fascination with determining golf's greatest of all time.
