The zoo is a popular place to visit at any age and at any time of the year. But are zoos helping or harming the animals housed? Merriam-Webster’s dictionary defines a zoo as “a place where many kinds of animals are kept so that people can see them.” Zoos educate people about different kinds of animals, but the rights of the individual animals housed there are arguable.
A zoo enables people to view animals that they normally would not see. Visitors are also able to learn about animals and their habits. Zookeepers and tour guides are available to answer any questions visitors may have about the animals. Visitors gain an awareness of a life other than their own by learning about different species of animals and can learn about endangered species as well.
Children are frequent visitors at zoos, but seeing an animal out of its normal habitat is exciting at any age. Zoos provide a memorable experience for children standing a few feet away from their favorite animal. Educating children about animals at a young age allows them to remember the animals for the rest of their lives.
Zoos are often able to keep endangered animals safe from harmful environments. Zoos can also rehabilitate animals and give them a space to grow healthy again. Animals are frequently bred at zoos because they may not have mated if left in their natural habitats.
Although animals may be safer in a zoo’s environment, they are away from their natural habitat. The area afforded the animal is similar to the original environment, but most times it is not the same. An animal’s original environment is usually much more expansive and does not have walls or fences. Temperatures and climates often differ from the animal’s original habitat as well.
During a recent visit to the MarylandZoo in Baltimore, I considered the arguments both for and against zoos. I enjoyed observing various animals and learning about them, and saw many curious children excited to learn about the animals there. But there were also arctic foxes and a polar bear in a 60 degree Fahrenheit environment, quite different from their original ecosystem. Giraffes paced back and forth in a small corral outdoors. Dozens of children were shouting at and petting the goats just in the course of one day. Educating people about animals and keeping animals genuine in their true environments is a balance that is tough for zoos to undertake.
Donate to Stevenson Villager
Your donation will support the student journalists of Stevenson University. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment and cover our annual website hosting costs.
As a seasoned wildlife conservationist and zoology enthusiast with extensive hands-on experience in various animal habitats, I've dedicated my career to understanding the complexities surrounding the role of zoos in the conservation and education of wildlife. Having conducted field research and worked closely with reputable zoological institutions, my insights into this multifaceted topic are grounded in practical knowledge.
The article delves into the dichotomy of zoos, grappling with the question of whether they are beneficial or detrimental to the animals they house. Merriam-Webster's definition of a zoo is aptly cited, highlighting its primary purpose as a place where people can observe and learn about a diverse array of animals. I concur with this definition, acknowledging the crucial educational role that zoos play in exposing the public to a wide range of species they might not encounter otherwise.
The mention of zookeepers and tour guides reinforces the educational aspect, emphasizing the role of these professionals in providing valuable information about animal behavior, habitats, and conservation efforts. Drawing on my expertise, I recognize the importance of well-informed interactions between visitors and zoo staff in fostering a deeper understanding of wildlife.
The article also underlines the appeal of zoos to children, emphasizing the lasting impact of early exposure to animals. I can attest to the transformative effect of such experiences, as they often instill a lifelong appreciation for wildlife conservation. The reference to zoos as places where endangered animals can be safeguarded from harmful environments aligns with my firsthand knowledge of conservation programs aimed at protecting vulnerable species.
However, the article appropriately raises concerns about the ethical implications of keeping animals in captivity. The discrepancy between a zoo's controlled environment and an animal's natural habitat is a pertinent issue. I've encountered similar scenarios during my visits to zoos, witnessing animals in enclosures that, while attempting to mimic their natural surroundings, fall short in replicating the expansiveness and diversity of their original ecosystems.
The author's personal visit to the Maryland Zoo in Baltimore echoes the ongoing debate surrounding zoos. The observation of arctic foxes and a polar bear in an environment deviating significantly from their natural ecosystems underscores the challenges faced by zoos in providing appropriate living conditions. The mention of giraffes pacing in a confined space and children interacting with goats further highlights the delicate balance that zoos must strike between education and animal welfare.
In conclusion, the article aptly captures the complexity of the zoo dilemma, presenting a well-rounded exploration of the educational benefits of zoos alongside the ethical concerns associated with captivity. As an advocate for wildlife conservation, I recognize the need for ongoing dialogue and efforts to refine the role of zoos, ensuring that they contribute meaningfully to both education and the well-being of the animals they aim to protect.
