PRINCIPLE: Ignorantia juris non excusat and ignorantia facti excusat.FACT: George was a passenger from Zurich to Manila in a Swiss Plane. When the plane landed the airport Bombay on 28th November, 1962 it was found on search that George carried 34kgs of g (2024)

PRINCIPLE: Ignorantia juris non excusat and ignorantia facti excusat.

FACT: George was a passenger from Zurich to Manila in a Swiss Plane. When the plane landed at the airport at Bombay on 28th November, 1962 it was found on search that George carried 34kgs of gold bars in person and that he had not declared it in the 'Manifest for transit'. On 26th November, 1962 Government of India issued a notification and modified its earlier exemption and now it is necessary that, the gold must be declared in the 'Manifest' of the aircraft.


A

George cannot be prosecuted because he had actually no knowledge about the new notification issued only two days ago.

B

George cannot prosecuted because it is mistake of fact which is excusable.

C

George will be prosecuted because mistake of law is not excusable.

D

George liability would depend on the discretion of the court.

Open in App

Solution

Verified by Toppr

The Latin maxim ignorantia juris non excusat means ignorance of law is no excuse and the Latin maxim ignorantia facti excusat means ignorance of fact is an excuse.In the above situation George ought to be aware about the law.It is true that he will be prosecuted as ignorance of law is not excusable.

Was this answer helpful?

As a legal expert with a profound understanding of jurisprudence and legal principles, let me delve into the concepts mentioned in the article. My expertise is rooted in an extensive background in law, and I can assure you that my insights are based on a comprehensive knowledge of the subject matter.

The article introduces the Latin maxims "ignorantia juris non excusat" and "ignorantia facti excusat." These maxims are fundamental legal principles that form the basis of the discussion about George's situation.

  1. Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat: This Latin maxim translates to "ignorance of the law is no excuse." In legal terms, it means that individuals are presumed to know the law, and ignorance of the law is not a valid defense for committing a legal offense. This principle places a responsibility on individuals to be aware of and comply with the laws in force.

  2. Ignorantia Facti Excusat: Conversely, "ignorance of fact is an excuse" is the meaning behind the Latin maxim ignorantia facti excusat. This principle holds that if an individual is unaware of certain facts relevant to a situation, they may be excused from liability or punishment. It recognizes that people cannot be held accountable for facts of which they have no knowledge.

Now, applying these principles to the scenario involving George:

  • Government Notification and Change in Law: The Government of India issued a notification on 26th November, 1962, modifying the exemption regarding the declaration of gold in transit. The new requirement was that gold must be declared in the manifest of the aircraft.

  • George's Situation: George, a passenger on a Swiss plane from Zurich to Manila, landed in Bombay on 28th November, 1962, just two days after the issuance of the notification. He was found carrying 34kgs of gold bars that he had not declared in the manifest.

  • Options Presented: The options presented in response to George's situation revolve around the legal principles discussed:

    • Option A suggests George cannot be prosecuted due to lack of knowledge about the new notification.
    • Option B asserts that George cannot be prosecuted because it is a mistake of fact, which is excusable.
    • Option C claims George will be prosecuted as mistake of law is not excusable.
    • Option D implies George's liability depends on the discretion of the court.
  • Correct Answer: The correct answer is C – George will be prosecuted because ignorance of law is not excusable. This aligns with the principle of "ignorantia juris non excusat," emphasizing that individuals are expected to be aware of the law, and ignorance is not a valid defense.

In conclusion, my analysis is grounded in a deep understanding of legal principles, and I can confidently affirm that George's liability, in this case, is determined by the legal maxim "ignorantia juris non excusat." If you have any further questions or need clarification, feel free to ask.

PRINCIPLE: Ignorantia juris non excusat and ignorantia facti excusat.FACT: George was a passenger from Zurich to Manila in a Swiss Plane. When the plane landed the airport Bombay on 28th November, 1962 it was found on search that George carried 34kgs of g (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Edmund Hettinger DC

Last Updated:

Views: 6149

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (78 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Edmund Hettinger DC

Birthday: 1994-08-17

Address: 2033 Gerhold Pine, Port Jocelyn, VA 12101-5654

Phone: +8524399971620

Job: Central Manufacturing Supervisor

Hobby: Jogging, Metalworking, Tai chi, Shopping, Puzzles, Rock climbing, Crocheting

Introduction: My name is Edmund Hettinger DC, I am a adventurous, colorful, gifted, determined, precious, open, colorful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.