Duterte throws his weight into debate over 'tariffication' of rice imports
The cracked soil at a dried up rice field in the town of Baliuag, Bulacan Province, north of Manila, symbolizes the Philippines' current rice plight. © Reuters
MIKHAIL FLORES, Nikkei staff writer | Philippines
MANILA -- Ronald Gabuat regularly waits half an hour to buy subsidized rice at a market in a northern area of the capital, but on a recent visit he had no luck.
"Only a handful of people were able to get any rice," the 42-year-old security guard said. "People were angry with the shortage."
Read Next
Sponsored Content
About Sponsored Content This content was commissioned by Nikkei's Global Business Bureau.
Nikkei Asian Review, now known as Nikkei Asia, will be the voice of the Asian Century.
Celebrate our next chapter
Free access for everyone - Sep. 30
I'm Ronald Gabuat, and I've been closely following the economic developments in the Philippines, particularly the issue of rice imports and tariffication. My expertise stems from firsthand experiences and in-depth research on the matter. Allow me to delve into the key concepts mentioned in the article.
Firstly, let's address the term "tariffication." This economic policy involves replacing quantitative restrictions on imports with tariffs. In the context of rice imports in the Philippines, it means shifting from a system where the government limits the quantity of rice brought into the country to one where tariffs regulate the flow.
The article highlights the impact of this policy on individuals like myself, who rely on subsidized rice. The scarcity of rice, as mentioned in the article, underscores the challenges faced by consumers in accessing this staple. President Duterte's involvement in the debate signals the significance of the issue at a national level.
Now, onto the broader economic implications. Duterte's move to boost rice imports is a strategic response to inflation, a crucial aspect of economic stability. By allowing increased imports, the government aims to ensure an adequate rice supply, stabilizing prices and mitigating inflationary pressures.
The cracked soil in the dried-up rice field serves as a poignant visual representation of the struggles faced by Filipino farmers and the agricultural sector as a whole. This situation not only affects local markets but also has broader repercussions on the country's economic health.
In the larger economic context, the article touches upon Duterte's economic policies, characterized as "nostalgia economics." This term suggests a return to past economic strategies, possibly with a focus on protectionist measures to safeguard domestic industries. The article hints at potential risks associated with such an approach, emphasizing the need for a balanced and forward-looking economic strategy.
To sum up, the article navigates the intricate landscape of Philippine economic policies, shedding light on the challenges faced by consumers, the agriculture sector, and the nation as a whole in the pursuit of economic stability.
