Milestones: 1899–1913 - Office of the Historian (2024)

NOTE TO READERS
“Milestones in the History of U.S. Foreign Relations” has been retired and is no longer maintained. For more information, please see the full notice.

After its defeat in the Spanish-American War of 1898, Spain ceded its longstanding colony of the Philippines to the United States in the Treaty of Paris. On February 4, 1899, just two days before the U.S. Senate ratified the treaty, fighting broke out between American forces and Filipino nationalists led by Emilio Aguinaldo who sought independence rather than a change in colonial rulers. The ensuing Philippine-American War lasted three years and resulted in the death of over 4,200 American and over 20,000 Filipino combatants. As many as 200,000 Filipino civilians died from violence, famine, and disease.

The decision by U.S. policymakers to annex the Philippines was not without domestic controversy. Americans who advocated annexation evinced a variety of motivations: desire for commercial opportunities in Asia, concern that the Filipinos were incapable of self-rule, and fear that if the United States did not take control of the islands, another power (such as Germany or Japan) might do so. Meanwhile, American opposition to U.S. colonial rule of the Philippines came in many forms, ranging from those who thought it morally wrong for the United States to be engaged in colonialism, to those who feared that annexation might eventually permit the non-white Filipinos to have a role in American national government. Others were wholly unconcerned about the moral or racial implications of imperialism and sought only to oppose the policies of President William McKinley’s administration.

After the Spanish-American War, while the American public and politicians debated the annexation question, Filipino revolutionaries under Aguinaldo seized control of most of the Philippines’ main island of Luzon and proclaimed the establishment of the independent Philippine Republic. When it became clear that U.S. forces were intent on imposing American colonial control over the islands, the early clashes between the two sides in 1899 swelled into an all-out war. Americans tended to refer to the ensuing conflict as an “insurrection” rather than acknowledge the Filipinos’ contention that they were fighting to ward off a foreign invader.

Milestones: 1899–1913 - Office of the Historian (2)

Emilio Aguinaldo

There were two phases to the Philippine-American War. The first phase, from February to November of 1899, was dominated by Aguinaldo’s ill-fated attempts to fight a conventional war against the better-trained and equipped American troops. The second phase was marked by the Filipinos’ shift to guerrilla-style warfare. It began in November of 1899, lasted through the capture of Aguinaldo in 1901 and into the spring of 1902, by which time most organized Filipino resistance had dissipated. President Theodore Roosevelt proclaimed a general amnesty and declared the conflict over on July 4, 1902, although minor uprisings and insurrections against American rule periodically occurred in the years that followed.

The United States entered the conflict with undeniable military advantages that included a trained fighting force, a steady supply of military equipment, and control of the archipelago’s waterways. Meanwhile, the Filipino forces were hampered by their inability to gain any kind of outside support for their cause, chronic shortages of weapons and ammunition, and complications produced by the Philippines’ geographic complexity. Under these conditions, Aguinaldo’s attempt to fight a conventional war in the first few months of the conflict proved to be a fatal mistake; the Filipino Army suffered severe losses in men and material before switching to the guerrilla tactics that might have been more effective if employed from the beginning of the conflict.

Milestones: 1899–1913 - Office of the Historian (3)

President Theodore Roosevelt

The war was brutal on both sides. U.S. forces at times burned villages, implemented civilian reconcentration policies, and employed torture on suspected guerrillas, while Filipino fighters also tortured captured soldiers and terrorized civilians who cooperated with American forces. Many civilians died during the conflict as a result of the fighting, cholera and malaria epidemics, and food shortages caused by several agricultural catastrophes.

Even as the fighting went on, the colonial government that the United States established in the Philippines in 1900 under future President William Howard Taft launched a pacification campaign that became known as the “policy of attraction.” Designed to win over key elites and other Filipinos who did not embrace Aguinaldo’s plans for the Philippines, this policy permitted a significant degree of self-government, introduced social reforms, and implemented plans for economic development. Over time, this program gained important Filipino adherents and undermined the revolutionaries’ popular appeal, which significantly aided the United States’ military effort to win the war.

In 1907, the Philippines convened its first elected assembly, and in 1916, the Jones Act promised the nation eventual independence. The archipelago became an autonomous commonwealth in 1935, and the U.S. granted independence in 1946.

As someone deeply immersed in the study of history and international relations, particularly focusing on U.S. foreign policy, the annexation of the Philippines by the United States following the Spanish-American War in 1898 stands as a pivotal moment. This marked a significant shift in American imperialism and its global ambitions, drawing widespread attention and debate both within the U.S. and globally.

The Treaty of Paris in 1898, concluding the Spanish-American War, resulted in Spain ceding the Philippines to the United States. However, the subsequent outbreak of hostilities between American forces and Filipino nationalists, led by Emilio Aguinaldo, demonstrated the complexity and the resistance against American colonial rule. This conflict, known as the Philippine-American War, lasted for three years, causing substantial casualties and fatalities on both sides.

The article highlights various motivations behind the U.S. decision to annex the Philippines, including economic interests in Asia, concerns about Filipino self-governance capabilities, and apprehensions about other global powers vying for control in the region. This annexation faced significant opposition within the U.S., stemming from moral, racial, and political concerns. The clash of ideologies and interests led to a multifaceted debate that resonated through different segments of American society.

Emilio Aguinaldo’s leadership and the phases of the Philippine-American War, characterized by initial attempts at conventional warfare followed by a shift to guerrilla tactics, underscore the strategic evolution of the conflict. The tactical errors and advantages on both sides, including military strengths, geographic challenges, and outside support, shaped the trajectory of the war.

The brutality of the conflict is a crucial aspect emphasized in the article. Both American and Filipino forces resorted to extreme measures, leading to civilian casualties and humanitarian crises. The establishment of the colonial government under William Howard Taft introduced policies aimed at pacification, social reforms, and economic development, altering the dynamics of the conflict and gradually reducing the support for the revolutionaries.

The eventual trajectory toward Philippine autonomy and independence, marked by milestones such as the 1907 elected assembly and the 1946 granting of independence by the U.S., reflects the evolving relationship between the two nations and the resolution of a complex historical episode.

This comprehensive overview of the Philippine-American War encapsulates the intricacies of imperialism, resistance movements, socio-political shifts, and the long-term implications of colonialism in shaping the course of international relations and the histories of both the United States and the Philippines.

Milestones: 1899–1913 - Office of the Historian (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Fredrick Kertzmann

Last Updated:

Views: 6381

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (66 voted)

Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Fredrick Kertzmann

Birthday: 2000-04-29

Address: Apt. 203 613 Huels Gateway, Ralphtown, LA 40204

Phone: +2135150832870

Job: Regional Design Producer

Hobby: Nordic skating, Lacemaking, Mountain biking, Rowing, Gardening, Water sports, role-playing games

Introduction: My name is Fredrick Kertzmann, I am a gleaming, encouraging, inexpensive, thankful, tender, quaint, precious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.