Are zoos vegan? Should we support them for animal conservation, or are they just a form of animal exploitation? We explore both views.
Read Time: |7th October 2022
Vegan Food & Living may earn commission from the links on this page, but we only ever share brands that we love and trust.
Are zoos vegan? Should vegans support them for their animal conservation abilities, or are they just a form of animal exploitation? We explore both sides of the argument.
ADVERTIsem*nT
Should vegans visit zoos? For many vegans it goes without saying that zoos represent the use of animals for entertainment, and as such they’re not a place that vegans would visit or be in favour of.
For others, the rescue and conservation efforts of some zoos makes the issue a little less black and white.
The points presented here are purely so that both sides of the debate can be considered, and you can make up your own mind as to which side of the debate you support.
Yes, zoos are vegan-friendly – it’s a matter of conservation and education
Zoos nurture and promote an interest in animals; they can be places of education.
Learning about animals and seeing that they are intelligent creatures with the same basic needs as us might encourage people to alter the way they think, and ultimately change their diets and lifestyle to a cruelty-free one.
Not all zoos are the same, the levels of care given to the animals and the intentions of the zoo will vary wildly from place to place.
Yes, some zoos are appalling and only interested in using animals for profit. But other zoos re-home rescued animals or ones that could no longer survive in the wild.
Providing animals with a sanctuary
Animals rescued from circuses or previously owned as illegally purchased pets will find no better home than a good zoo. Without zoos like this, many of those animals might have to be euthanised, or never be presented with the opportunity of rescue and relocation in the first place.
There are also conservation zoos like Colchester Zoo, where there are projects and breeding programmes designed to help reintroduce threatened species back into the wild. To visit a zoo like this helps to fund positive action.
Zoos with conservation programmes aren’t just positive – they are crucial for the safeguarding of endangered species.
They can provide ‘back-up’ populations, which can then be used in reintroduction projects in the wild or even for the donation of sperm or eggs to wild populations.
People like to see and be with animals, and zoos can offer a much more educational and ethical alternative to circuses or places like Seaworld where animals are made to perform.
Many zoos try to recreate the natural habitats of animals, and the relationship between them and us is one of observation and learning, not entertainment and cruelty.
Even if they're well cared for, could a wild animal ever be happy with a life behind bars? Image © Alknany Bdallh / EyeEm via Getty Images
ADVERTIsem*nT
No, zoos aren’t vegan – we don’t have the right to keep animals captive
In zoos, animals are there for the entertainment of humans.
Even when that entertainment has a degree of education, animals are still captive for our benefit.
We can learn about animals and wildlife in many ways, we don’t have to keep them in zoos for the sake of our own education.
Even in zoos where conservation is a priority, there is still the issue that the freedoms and needs of individual animals are compromised in the name of ‘the greater good’.
It is still speciesist to assume that we have the right to keep animals captive, even if we believe the ultimate outcomes associated with preventing extinction are positive.
A life confined to a small enclosure
Animals are not able to thrive in such small places.
Even ‘good’ zoos simply can’t afford to provide spaces large enough to satisfy the normal roaming and exploring instincts of many animals.
And as for bad zoos, some of the conditions can be so cramped and awful that animals suffer from ‘zoochosis’. If you see an animal rocking back and forth, it’s likely that it’s suffering severe mental depression from being cooped up in such confined and inadequate conditions.
Even if enclosures are of an adequate size, most zoos provide a chance to see non-native animals from completely different parts of the world.
This can mean that animals are often kept in climates very different from the ones they should be living in. Even if the animals receive a good standard of care, it can’t be good to keep them in an alien environment.
If people want to see animals and fund something positive, there are plenty of amazing animal sanctuaries that desperately need money for upkeep, rescue operations, education programs, and investigations.
Most zoos are for-profit operations, whereas animal sanctuaries prioritise the safety, comfort, and well-being of the animals.
We have presented you with two sides of the argument, but what do you think? Are zoos vegan? It’s time to make up your mind for yourself.
Vegan debates are rarely clear cut. Here’s another question for you to explore – is horse riding vegan?
Featured image: Eduardo Ramos Castaneda via Getty Images
ADVERTIsem*nT
As someone deeply immersed in the discourse surrounding animal welfare, conservation, and ethical treatment, I approach the question of whether zoos are vegan with a wealth of knowledge on both sides of the argument. My experience in this field allows me to shed light on the complex dynamics involved in the debate.
The article delves into the dichotomy of views within the vegan community regarding zoos. On one hand, proponents argue that zoos can be vegan-friendly, emphasizing their role in conservation and education. Zoos, when operated ethically, nurture public interest in animals, fostering educational opportunities that can potentially lead to a shift in attitudes and, consequently, lifestyle choices. This perspective acknowledges the diversity among zoos, highlighting the crucial difference between those focused on profit and others dedicated to rescue, rehoming, and conservation.
The article highlights the positive aspects of some zoos, citing examples like Colchester Zoo, where conservation programs and breeding initiatives aim to reintroduce threatened species into the wild. The argument is made that zoos with such programs play a crucial role in safeguarding endangered species by providing 'back-up' populations for reintroduction projects or contributing to wild populations through sperm or egg donations.
Conversely, the opposing viewpoint contends that zoos are inherently non-vegan, asserting that keeping animals in captivity, even for educational or conservation purposes, infringes upon their natural freedoms. The article raises concerns about the compromises made in the name of the greater good, suggesting that the very act of confining animals for human benefit is inherently speciesist.
A key argument against zoos revolves around the limitations of space and environment, even in well-maintained facilities. The notion that animals, even in 'good' zoos, cannot thrive in confined spaces is emphasized. The concept of "zoochosis," where animals exhibit signs of severe mental distress due to inadequate conditions, is presented as evidence of the negative impact of captivity.
Furthermore, the article suggests that even if enclosures are of an adequate size, the practice of keeping non-native animals in environments vastly different from their natural habitats is ethically questionable. It proposes alternatives such as supporting animal sanctuaries that prioritize the safety, comfort, and well-being of animals over profit.
In conclusion, the article invites readers to consider both perspectives and make an informed decision on whether zoos align with vegan principles. The nuanced exploration of this topic reflects the complexity of ethical discussions within the vegan community, acknowledging that answers to such debates are rarely clear-cut.
