Abstract / Description of output
We use the British real estate and investment fund industries as experimental
settings where historic cost (HC) and fair value accounting (FVA) can be compared. Both industries have the majority of their assets marked to market and hence the difference between the two accounting systems is profound. However, as the valuation of real estate is arguably more subjective than that of investment funds, we are able to contrast fair value accounting in a near ideal setting with one where it remains important, but where valuation difficulties may permit bias. As this distinction is incorporated in the recently issued SFAS 157, which also formed the basis of the IASB’s relevant discussion document, the results of our study may be particularly timely. As expected, we find that fair value income is considerably more value relevant than historic cost income. However, in the presence of changes in FVA balance sheet values, income
measures become largely irrelevant. This implies that there is no obvious advantage from adopting FVA income accounting if FVA balance sheet values are available to the user. Furthermore, FVA for our real estate sample is considerably less value relevant than for the investment companies and the evidence for this sample, if not conclusive, is consistent with earnings management. We interpret these results as confirming that fair values are highly relevant and largely unbiased where the values are unambiguous.
Where valuation is ambiguous, which will normally be the case, value relevance will be lower and biased accounting may be revealed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 271-303 |
Number of pages | 33 |
Journal | European Accounting Review |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2008 |
Access to Document
An Experiment in Fair Value Accounting
This is an Author's Original Manuscript of an article whose final and definitive form, the Version of Record, is © Rees, W., & Danbolt, J. (2008). An Experiment in Fair Value Accounting: UK Investment Vehicles. European Accounting Review, 17(2), 271-303. 10.1080/09638180701819865. Available online at : http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09638180701819865
Accepted author manuscript, 341 KB
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'An Experiment in Fair Value Accounting: UK Investment Vehicles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
View full fingerprint
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
Rees, W. (2008). An Experiment in Fair Value Accounting: UK Investment Vehicles. European Accounting Review, 17(2), 271-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180701819865
Rees, W. ; Danbolt, Jo. / An Experiment in Fair Value Accounting: UK Investment Vehicles. In: European Accounting Review. 2008 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 271-303.
@article{d328f8886c3a41f48b7ef41d17e5cd85,
title = "An Experiment in Fair Value Accounting: UK Investment Vehicles",
abstract = "We use the British real estate and investment fund industries as experimentalsettings where historic cost (HC) and fair value accounting (FVA) can be compared. Both industries have the majority of their assets marked to market and hence the difference between the two accounting systems is profound. However, as the valuation of real estate is arguably more subjective than that of investment funds, we are able to contrast fair value accounting in a near ideal setting with one where it remains important, but where valuation difficulties may permit bias. As this distinction is incorporated in the recently issued SFAS 157, which also formed the basis of the IASB{\textquoteright}s relevant discussion document, the results of our study may be particularly timely. As expected, we find that fair value income is considerably more value relevant than historic cost income. However, in the presence of changes in FVA balance sheet values, incomemeasures become largely irrelevant. This implies that there is no obvious advantage from adopting FVA income accounting if FVA balance sheet values are available to the user. Furthermore, FVA for our real estate sample is considerably less value relevant than for the investment companies and the evidence for this sample, if not conclusive, is consistent with earnings management. We interpret these results as confirming that fair values are highly relevant and largely unbiased where the values are unambiguous.Where valuation is ambiguous, which will normally be the case, value relevance will be lower and biased accounting may be revealed.",
author = "W. Rees and Jo Danbolt",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1080/09638180701819865",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "271--303",
journal = "European Accounting Review",
issn = "1468-4497",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",
}
Rees, W 2008, 'An Experiment in Fair Value Accounting: UK Investment Vehicles', European Accounting Review, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 271-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180701819865
An Experiment in Fair Value Accounting: UK Investment Vehicles. / Rees, W.; Danbolt, Jo.
In: European Accounting Review, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2008, p. 271-303.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - An Experiment in Fair Value Accounting: UK Investment Vehicles
AU - Rees, W.
AU - Danbolt, Jo
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - We use the British real estate and investment fund industries as experimentalsettings where historic cost (HC) and fair value accounting (FVA) can be compared. Both industries have the majority of their assets marked to market and hence the difference between the two accounting systems is profound. However, as the valuation of real estate is arguably more subjective than that of investment funds, we are able to contrast fair value accounting in a near ideal setting with one where it remains important, but where valuation difficulties may permit bias. As this distinction is incorporated in the recently issued SFAS 157, which also formed the basis of the IASB’s relevant discussion document, the results of our study may be particularly timely. As expected, we find that fair value income is considerably more value relevant than historic cost income. However, in the presence of changes in FVA balance sheet values, incomemeasures become largely irrelevant. This implies that there is no obvious advantage from adopting FVA income accounting if FVA balance sheet values are available to the user. Furthermore, FVA for our real estate sample is considerably less value relevant than for the investment companies and the evidence for this sample, if not conclusive, is consistent with earnings management. We interpret these results as confirming that fair values are highly relevant and largely unbiased where the values are unambiguous.Where valuation is ambiguous, which will normally be the case, value relevance will be lower and biased accounting may be revealed.
AB - We use the British real estate and investment fund industries as experimentalsettings where historic cost (HC) and fair value accounting (FVA) can be compared. Both industries have the majority of their assets marked to market and hence the difference between the two accounting systems is profound. However, as the valuation of real estate is arguably more subjective than that of investment funds, we are able to contrast fair value accounting in a near ideal setting with one where it remains important, but where valuation difficulties may permit bias. As this distinction is incorporated in the recently issued SFAS 157, which also formed the basis of the IASB’s relevant discussion document, the results of our study may be particularly timely. As expected, we find that fair value income is considerably more value relevant than historic cost income. However, in the presence of changes in FVA balance sheet values, incomemeasures become largely irrelevant. This implies that there is no obvious advantage from adopting FVA income accounting if FVA balance sheet values are available to the user. Furthermore, FVA for our real estate sample is considerably less value relevant than for the investment companies and the evidence for this sample, if not conclusive, is consistent with earnings management. We interpret these results as confirming that fair values are highly relevant and largely unbiased where the values are unambiguous.Where valuation is ambiguous, which will normally be the case, value relevance will be lower and biased accounting may be revealed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=47349118880&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09638180701819865
DO - 10.1080/09638180701819865
M3 - Article
SN - 1468-4497
VL - 17
SP - 271
EP - 303
JO - European Accounting Review
JF - European Accounting Review
IS - 2
ER -
Rees W, Danbolt J. An Experiment in Fair Value Accounting: UK Investment Vehicles. European Accounting Review. 2008;17(2):271-303. doi: 10.1080/09638180701819865